Life after UT

This fall, Jai will be joining Linguistics program at NYU, Kevin will be joining Linguistics program at OSU, and Steven will be starting an appointment in the Department of Spanish and Portuguese at Indiana as a Postdoctoral Scholar. Congratulations to Jai, Kevin, and Steven! Can’t wait to see what great things you will accomplish!



Explore UT 2018

We had great time talking with middle and high school students about phonetics, acoustics, and our research. My students were fantastic at engaging these future scientists!!

Quantifying phonetic variation

Come join us for another exciting talk by Jennifer Cole,  on Thursday, February 15th, at 3 pm in JES A217A.

Quantifying phonetic variation

Speech is known to be highly variable across speakers and situations, and listeners pay attention to some of this phonetic detail for the rich contextual information it carries. In this talk I ask how much variability is present in speech, and whether some components of speech are more or less susceptible to variation. I present an approach to quantifying phonetic variation developed in collaboration with Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel (MIT), which approaches the question from the dual perspectives of perception and production. We analyze serial imitations of a heard utterance, where the linguistic object to be produced is fixed syntactically, lexically and prosodically, and employ a novel method for quantifying phonetic variation using acoustic landmarks (Stevens 2002) as correlates of phonologically-contrastive manner features. Imitated utterances produced by ten native speakers of American English resulted in 3500+ consonant and vowel landmarks (LMs), which were labelled and compared both to the lexically-specified LMs, and to the LMs produced in the stimulus. Our findings demonstrate and quantify systematicity in phonetic variation as measured in terms of LMs. They also reveal that speakers exercise choice in phonetic implementation, deviating both from lexical targets and from the phonetic detail of the heard stimulus. These results hold promise for the use of imitated speech in the study of phonetic variation, and for the use of LMs (and by extension other feature cues) as a phonologically-grounded measure of variation in speech production.

Colloquium – The Linguistics and Philosophy of Language Acquisition

Join us for a talk by Geoffrey K. Pullum (School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Acquisition, University of Edinburgh)

The Linguistics and Philosophy of Language Acquisition

Mon, February 12, 2018 | CLA 1.302B

3:00 PM – 5:00 PM

For five decades, discussions of the view known as linguistic nativism have woven together topics in generative linguistics and rationalist philosophy. Syntactic research is claimed to reveal a “universal grammar” that would be unlearnable from linguistic experience and hence provides a compelling case for the existence of “innate ideas.” It is quite unusual for empirical work in the “special sciences” to produce results that reorient traditional philosophical discussions It therefore behooves syntacticians to ensure that their results are both copious and solid. I review some of the load-bearing syntactic results cited in the debate, and argue that they will not support the necessary weight. Foremost among the latter is an argument developed 40 years ago in this department, here at the University of Texas.